DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR3204-13
19 September 2013
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Torr Secretary of the Navy
Subj : READ RMON, aii
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Rei: (a) Tile 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 13 Mar 13 w/attachments
(2) HQOMC MIQ memo dtd 2 Jul 13 w/enclosure
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070”) entry
dated 24 September 2007 (copy at Tab A).
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Chapman and
Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 19 September 2013, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed ina timely manner.
c. The contested entry states Petitioner has been assigned
reenlistment eligibility code RE-30 (refused orders assigned
without sufficient obligated service remaining) because he would
not reenlist/extend to comply with Pcs (permanent change of
station) orders. He contends the entry should be removed,
stating that he initially denied the orders because he wanted to
do recruiting, but that after thought and guidance he executed
the orders he had previously denied; and that the Marine Corps
Total Force System data as of the date of his application to
this Board shows his reenlistment eligibility code as RE-1A
(recommended and eligible for reenlistment).
d. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case has
commented to the effect his request should be denied, as the
fact he has reenlisted and eventually executed orders is
irrelevant since the reenlistment “does not take away his
refusal to incur further obligated service at the time when
orders were originally assigned to him.”
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
notwithstanding enclosure (2), the Board finds an injustice
warranting the requested relief. In this connection, the Board
agrees with Petitioner that since he has executed the orders he
initially denied, he has reenlisted, and he no longer has the
RE-30 reenlistment eligibility code, the contested entry no
longer serves a legitimate purpose, but is merely unfairly
punitive. In view of the foregoing, the Board recommends the
following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 24 September 2007. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
On tin PL arn
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your
review and action.
Reviewed and approved:
ACBERT L. WOODS
Assistamm “eneral Counsel
(Manpow. and Reserve Affairs)
1000 Nas y Pentagon, Rm 4D548
Washington, DC 20350-1000
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10930 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by revoking his reenlistment code of RE-30 (refused oraers assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining) . f. In enclosure (4), Petitioner contends that his having been assigned the RE-1A reenlistment code justifies removing the contested entry concerning the RE-30 code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3056 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070") entry dated 14 November 2011 (copy at Tab A). d. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect his request should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11866 14
c. The page 11 entry at issue counsels Petitioner for “Violation of the UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice] Article 92 by involving yourself in an inappropriate relationship with the spouse of another service member.” d. Enclosure (3) shows that the PERB basis for removing the contested fitness report included a finding that the page 11 entry in question, which was cited in the fitness report, “was not substantiated.” e. In the advisory opinion at enclosure (4), the HOMC office with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01582-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 1582-11 10 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy ij REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2811 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 April to 16 May 2012 (copy at Tab A). The PERB found it was “unfortunate, but not likely, that [Petitioner’s] marital problems started only 19 days after he reported to DI school on 1 April 2012 when his wife filed divorce papers...” MAJORITY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06749-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 6749-10 11 April 2011 : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) To? That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 12 December 2008. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review and action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05979-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 26 April 2000 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...